Wednesday, March 3, 2021 – 01:54
The community considers that the new decree “reduces flexibility to the system and moves us away from European countries”
Manuel Castells backs down in his plan to “consolidate” the three-year careers and now force them to all last four years
Manuel Castells postpones his university reform due to the discomfort of teachers
The universities will not support Manuel Castells in his intention to eliminate the three-year degrees and replace them with four-year degrees. In the next few days, the Rectors Conference (Crue) You are going to meet and take a common stance, but your first impressions of the latest version of the draft are not good. Royal Decree of University Teaching that the Ministry presented yesterday. The text proposes just the opposite of what Castells intended to do a year ago in another b
that bet on a flexible system where the so-called
(degree of three years and master of two) with the majority
(degree of four years and master of one). The latest draft, presented yesterday by the Secretary General,
Jos Manuel Pingarrn
, imposes a new model by which all three-year degrees must necessarily increase their duration to four years. It does so in response to
of the unions and
, who consider that 3 + 2 is more expensive for students and offers lower quality than 4 + 1. But the principals do not like this new change. They say that the matter was already resolved as agreed after the reform carried out by
Jos Ignacio Wert
in 2015, when they agreed that the three-year degrees were limited only to very specific cases that dealt with rigorously new content. That’s why only
The degrees that exist in Spain are three years. The rest last four.
Without consulting the rectors
A consensus had been reached on this issue and the 3 + 2 was not even the subject of open negotiation between Castells and the rectors. Prior to
They had reached an agreement and it did not contemplate eradicating 3 + 2. Castells did not consult this change of now, which he has carried in the most complete of secrets. The rectors received the draft on Monday at 8:30 p.m., when everything was already decided. To say that all three-year grades must revert to four years is nonsense. It is not a correct step in university autonomy, it reduces flexibility to the system and distances us from most European countries, where there are more three-year than four-year degrees, he summarizes
, rector of the
Autonomous University of Barcelona
. and president of the
Catalan Association of Public Universities (Acup).
Private campuses also think the same.
Josep Maria Garrell
, rector of the
Ramon Llull University
de Barcelona, denounces that changing the system from time to time generates legal insecurity. The three-year degrees serve the needs of the occupational market and fill a void. If we move them to four years, problems will be generated for those who have graduated, he emphasizes. The feeling of the Catalan campuses extends to campuses in other parts of Spain.
Juan Francisco Juli
, vice president of the Crue, says that, although the prevailing model is 4 + 1, it would be good not to limit the three-year option in the future to those universities that, in the exercise of their autonomy, could consider it, because there will probably be new curricular profiles that are better adapted to 3 + 2. Pingarrn argues that, once the low incidence of the three-year degrees is seen, it made no sense to maintain this double track that all it creates is confusion. The
de Castells argues that the same knowledge cannot be acquired in four years as in three. There are careers that cannot be done in three years, such as Law or Medicine, but maybe others. And, if it cannot, we will have to see why in other countries they do it and we cannot, reflects the professor.
, vice president of the
Knowledge and Development Foundation.
To continue reading for free
According to the criteria of
Source site www.elmundo.es