The PP criticized the lack of accountability of the Government regarding the rescue fund for strategic companies managed by SEPI, as well as the lack of direction of this public company
This is stated in the motion registered in Congress, to which Europa Press has had access, as a result of the interpellation addressed to the Minister of Finance and Government spokesperson, Mara Jess Montero, in the last control session to the Executive.
There the PP criticized the lack of government accountability for the strategic companies rescue fund managed by SEPI, as well as the lack of direction of this public company. And it is that since October 2019, when Vicente Fernndez Guerrero dismissed due to his indictment in the ‘Aznalcllar case’, the agency remains no president.
With the motion, the ‘popular’ ask to appoint a president for SEPI within a month and, if not, elevate their current vice president to president, Bartolom Lora. They also require the Government to “actually” fulfill its control obligations and provide the information requested. Among others, the files of all the operations approved so far to the Finance Commission, with the files that justify compliance with all legal requirements.
And the fact is that the PP wants that, once this documentation has been provided, if the majority of the Commission disagrees with the decision adopted by the SEPI and the Government in any specific operation, it is subjected to an external and independent assessment to determine if it conforms to the law or not.
INVESTIGATE THE RESCUE OF PLUS ULTRA.
The management of this rescue fund is not the only formation that will bring the management of this rescue fund to the Plenary of Congress, since Vox, who also appealed to Minister Montero, has registered a motion to condition the management of the rescue fund and act against one of its operations. , the aid granted to the airline Plus Ultra.
In his motion, Vox claims to send the file approved for this operation to the Anticorruption Prosecutor “in order to open investigation proceedings in relation to the alleged commission of crimes in the granting of aid.”
On the other hand, this training also asks to “define precisely the condition of ‘strategic company'” in the fund’s regulations, reduce the deadline for resolution of applications to access the grants from six to three months and that the president of the manager of the fund is accountable to Congress every three months for the evolution of operations.
Likewise, it calls for limiting career officials belonging to State lawyers, commercial technicians and economists, and State auditors and auditors from entering the management and administration bodies of intervened companies.
Finally, it proposes that the Independent Authority for Fiscal Responsibility (AIReF) prepare an annual ‘ex-post’ report on the management of these public funds destined for strategic companies, and its submission to Congress within one month of its completion.
According to the criteria of
Source site www.elmundo.es