Strict containment “would have made it possible to limit the spread of the virus”
For Dominique Costagliola, the measures taken by the government are not sufficient in the face of the scale of the crisis, in particular because of the virulence of the English variant. “This variant is more transmissible, which means that the measures to contain the epidemic must be more important to achieve the same result as before,” she explains. “We have the impression that at the level of the decisions taken to control the epidemic, the lessons have not been learned.” “Controlling the epidemic does not mean waiting until there is a maximum number of people hospitalized in intensive care, it is stopping the circulation of the virus”, continues Dominique Costagliola.
Strict containment in February would have, according to her, “made it possible to limit the spread of this virus, and allowed the moment when it would have become dominant to be moved back, which would have made it possible to gain time to see the vaccine doses arrive”. And to insist: “We have a timing that is not right at all.”
“Government has made confinement the absolute scarecrow”
But the government has for months ruled out the hypothesis of strict confinement, in particular because of its impact on the economy, but also the weariness of the French in the face of restrictions. “The government has made confinement the absolute scarecrow, and afterwards, it says it cannot do it because it is unpleasant for people”, regrets Dominique Costagliola. “But a situation in which we wait every Thursday to know what sauce we are going to be eaten with, without having any perspective, with whole sections of the economy that are at a standstill, I’m not sure that is managing at the end of the day. better the situation with the objective of minimizing damage, whether health, social and economic. ”
“I think that by taking stronger measures, but shorter, in the end, we would have had a better result,” concludes Dominique Costagliola.
Source site www.europe1.fr