Friday, March 26, 2021 – 18:32
The magistrate Garca Castelln decrees the dismissal of the procedure for the businessman Luis Glvez, indicated by the ex-treasurer of the PP.
Box B ..
The builder Glvez denies to the judge having delivered black money to Esperanza Aguirre in Gnova
The head of the Central Court of Instruction Number 6 of the National High Court Manuel Garca Castelln has agreed to file the complaint against the builder Luis Glvez, owner of the Ploder company, after he denied yesterday having made any delivery of black money to the former president of the Community of Madrid Hope Aguirre in the context of the Pnica case.
Thus, the examiner agrees to the aforementioned provisional dismissal of the procedure with respect to Glvez at the request of the Anticorruption Prosecutor, hours after the employer gave a statement in court.
Glvez appeared this Thursday as an investigated before Judge García Castelln after the former treasurer of the PP Luis Brcenas accused him of having made a donation of 60,000 euros in cash at the national headquarters of the PP which, always according to its version, immediately followed the also former head of party finances, lvaro Lapuerta, He handed Aguirre in hand. Glvez denied everything and his explanations have convinced both the judge and the prosecutor.
In a car, to which EL MUNDO has had access, the Pnica instructor maintains that “the lack of evidence that supports Mr. Brcenas’s statements, and another, the verisimilitude in the statement of the investigated” cause that “the investigation cannot be maintained. de Glvez Murcia at a procedural moment in which a special rigor is required in the control of the procedural budgets that support the accusation “.
In this sense, the magistrate refers to the fact that the instruction of a separate piece for the alleged irregular financing of the Madrid PP comes to an end. “The completion of the investigation phase imposes special rigor in the examination of the proceedings carried out, and it must be ruled out to proceed with the investigation with respect to those investigated who, of course, and in accordance with article 779 of the Criminal Procedure Law, those that, it is appreciated that there are no rational indications that support the accusation “, indicates the togado.
Prescription of offenses
In addition, García Castelln hints that the facts that Brcenas related in his appearance as a witness in this proceeding – that a series of businessmen made donations to the Fundescam using the donation instrument in order to have a receipt to deduct, but in order to channel these contributions to the electoral campaign of the Popular Party of Madrid – they could not be framed in a crime of irregular financing since it had not been classified the year 2015 while the former treasurer made reference to an event that, according to his version, occurred in 2007.
On the other hand, the judge assures that these events cannot be investigated as a crime of influence peddling or bribery since they will be prescribed, according to the Penal Code.
“In conclusion, on the assumption that the possible existence of the fact under investigation had been minimally accredited, which is not the case, it would not have been possible to proceed with the accusation either, since the facts reported by Luis Brcenas had been affected by the statute of limitations. with respect to Luis Glvez “, indicates the judge in the resolution of file.
According to the criteria of
Source site www.elmundo.es