Thursday, April 1, 2021
Home World Congress approves the right to decide one's own death by 202 votes...
- Advertisement -

Congress approves the right to decide one’s own death by 202 votes in favor versus 141 against

Thursday, March 18, 2021 – 12:47

PP and Vox will try to stop the entry into force of the law presented against it, two appeals of unconstitutionality

Meritxell Batet, president of the Congress, during the plenary session this Thursday.
Zipi EFE

  • - Advertisement -


    This is the law of euthanasia: only serious, chronic and incurable cases and with four filters

  • Politics.

    Congress approves the right to euthanasia in Spain with 198 votes

The right to a dignified death, the euthanasia law that includes it, will be in force in Spain within three months. Spaniards who suffer from incurable, chronic and disabling diseases, those who are in the terminal phase, who lack all hope of enjoying a dignified life and endure intolerable suffering, may consciously, voluntarily and informedly put an end to it. his own hand or with help, always with medical supervision and without any type of criminal counterclaim.

The law has been approved by Congress with 202 votes in favor to 141 against after a debate in which profound discrepancies have been revealed between those who see the norm as a moral aberration and bet instead on a comprehensive reinforcement of the law. palliative care and a maximum endowment of means for dependency and those who celebrate a decision that has taken years to be substantiated, that expands the field of individual freedoms and that nevertheless “arrives late”, as several spokespersons have pointed out, for many persons.

- Advertisement -

PP and Vox have been the two political forces that have opposed the norm. In fact, they have already announced the presentation of an unconstitutionality appeal against it, the one from Vox to include the request for suspension of the rule as long as the high court does not rule on the merits of it.

Both formations have been harshly criticized by the rest of the parliamentary groups for understanding that they intend to “impose their morals” and their “intolerance”. United We can even blamed them on a data taken from the CIS: 82% of citizens are betting on this law.

Those who have defended euthanasia have insisted that it is “a right and not an obligation”, an “example of legislative empathy” with those who suffer an ordeal and to whom “more legal suffering” cannot be added, as has the PNV spokesperson pointed out. “This law is for those who do not have sufficient palliative capable of alleviating their situation.”

Ciudadanos has also emphasized the goodness of the rule that adds Spain to the list of European countries -Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg- that already contemplate the “right to decide” when to end one’s life or, if prefers, “in what conditions do they want to live.” The orange formation has been very satisfied with this law, which is, in their opinion, an example of “useful policy” and “guarantee” in favor of freedoms and rights.

In the same sense, ERC has positioned itself, which has highlighted the “advance in rights and freedoms” that the law supposes because, not in vain, it recognizes the right to self-determination of people, a concept especially vindicated in other areas by the independentists.

Since Vox, the discourse against euthanasia has been tough. “A norm of death”, a “mockery” that “surpasses the limits of a democratic state” and becomes “especially repulsive and disgusting” when tens of thousands of deaths are still mourned by the pandemic. “We say goodbye to life, human rights and the principles of the Constitution,” claimed its spokesperson Lourdes Mndez. Vox has emphasized that the law, having been presented as a proposal by parliamentary groups, has circumvented all the mandatory opinions for an organic norm and has “ignored and despised”.

The popular have also regretted that the rule has disregarded all reports and is approved expressly in the midst of a pandemic. The PP like Vox argues that the biotics committee of Spain and the psychiatrist are against it because it opens the door to unsolicited euthanasia and turns our country into a suitable terrain for end-of-life tourism. “An attack against human life” and “blackmail” to health workers, in the opinion of the PP spokesman for whom “the desire to die disappears when people are treated properly.”

“This law supposes pushing the most vulnerable; it has a powerful effect called death”, has assured the deputy Jos Ignacio Echniz for whom the essential thing is to develop palliative care, a benefit that, as he has defended, can no longer be requested in domicile while death can be ordered at home.

After these harsh allegations, the socialist deputy, Mara Luisa Carcedo, former Minister of Health and one of the main promoters of the law, has highlighted the importance of eliminating criminal sanctions for those who help another person to die. The norm is “freedom with capital letters”, he has defended after reading the assessment that people in a very serious situation make of the law. The socialist deputy has replied to the PP’s request for palliative care, reminding them that it was they who up to three times opposed a law on this issue and cut up to 12,000 million in dependence. Carcedo’s intervention has been welcomed with a long applause from the left wing.

The euthanasia law that has been approved including the amendments from the Senate, provides that any person with a “serious and incurable disease” or “chronic and incapacitating condition” that causes “intolerable physical or psychological suffering” can request help to die. Euthanasia will be a benefit included in the portfolio of the national health system and therefore its cost will be borne by the State.

The petition must, however, respect strict conditions: be a Spanish national or legal resident; be in a position of capacity and awareness at the time of making the request; formulate it in writing and without pressure and repeat it after fifteen days; The application must also be analyzed and approved by two doctors and receive the authorization of an Evaluation Commission. For their part, doctors and any healthcare professional can plead “conscientious objection” and refuse to participate in the procedure.

According to the criteria of

The Trust Project

Know more

Source site

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

- Advertisement -