Wednesday, March 31, 2021
Home Breaking News Censored images from Wahib live stream also harmful: 'Don't distribute them' |...
- Advertisement -

Censored images from Wahib live stream also harmful: ‘Don’t distribute them’ | NOW

The images of the underage boy who was pressured by Bilal Wahib on Instagram to show his genitals are harmful to the victim in all forms. Even if the images are partly blurred or if the video is less explicit in some other way, the Expertisebureau Online Child Abuse (EOKM) warns in conversation with The organization therefore calls on not to distribute images of this kind either.

Actor Bilal Wahib urged the underage boy on an Instagram livestream on Tuesday evening to show his genitals. The 22-year-old actor is now suspected of distributing child pornography.

EOKM director Arda Gerkens warned in the TV program on Wednesday On 1 all that possessing or forwarding the sexually explicit images is punishable. “For everyone who has that video now: it’s child pornography. You can’t have it, you can’t share it.”

“Even if the victim is unrecognizable, posting the images can be harmful.”

Simone Belt, information officer

But even people who own censored or edited videos should not forward these so-called contextual images or post them on social media, according to the EOKM.

- Advertisement -

“Even if the victim is unrecognizable, posting the images can be harmful,” says Simone Belt of, a part of the EOKM that assists young people with online sexual abuse.

“Victims are particularly concerned whether their friends, acquaintances and future employers recognize them. They also contribute to the fact that everyone can have seen the images. That can have a major impact on psychological well-being.”

The fact that censored images are also shared online ensures that the victim can be continuously confronted with the incident, says Belt. “The images may subside, but reappear after a few years. Not distributing the videos helps to reduce that.”

Non-explicit images on Facebook and Instagram are also prohibited

“Internet companies are taking quick action with sexually explicit images, because online child sexual abuse material is punishable almost everywhere in the world,” says Michael Klos of Leiden University. “But with censored images that is a lot more difficult from a legal point of view.”

- Advertisement -

Klos examines how social media act in this gray area: where does freedom of expression stop in situations that are not clearly illegal?

Because it is legally complicated, victims of online sexual abuse depend on the enforcement of internet companies. “Social media may decide that placing contextual images is also outside their terms”, EOKM director Gerkens told about this.

“It will be virtually impossible to take everything completely offline. That is a harsh reality. ”

Simone Belt, information officer

Facebook, also owner of Instagram, is clear about this when asked: non-explicit images of the Wahib incident are also prohibited. Even if the images are blurred or if the video is shared to condemn the incident, a spokesperson said.

“Facebook has to balance freedom of speech and the interests of the victim,” says researcher Klos. “You can see very clearly that the company is giving more weight to the boy’s interests here.”

Expertise bureau calls for images to be reported

A YouTube spokesperson refers to policies on the sexualization of minors and images that can lead to emotional distress in minors, but did not want to specifically comment on images from the Wahib incident.

“If we report it to YouTube, they will remove it,” says EOKM director Gerkens about the implementation of this policy. “They don’t act on their own. So report it to us if you see these kinds of images.” has made Twitter aware of contextual images from the Instagram live stream that have been shared on the social medium. Also this company is to get an explanation of it policy asked. In answer to the question whether contextual images are prohibited, the answer is only to act against images in which child sexual abuse is visible.

“Everyone who sees the images must speak out against them,” says Belt of “It’s not nice that those context images are also circulating. It will be virtually impossible to take everything completely offline. That’s a harsh reality. But if people stop spreading it, it can really make a big difference.”

Source site

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

- Advertisement -