We can recognize a “level of confrontation” with the PSOE not seen so far


United We can claim to have appreciated a “arrogant attitude” in the PSOE, as a result of the Equal Treatment Law and the debate on it, and they are concerned about how that tension may affect governance and the progressive project that the coalition has.

This has been indicated by the secretary general of the parliamentary group in Congress, Txema Pebble, who in statements to the ‘Parliament’ program of RNE, collected by Europa Press, has admitted that these two issues have generated a “level of confrontation” between partners that “had not yet been reached”.

In this sense, Guijarro has pointed to the first vice president, Carmen Calvo, as one of the factors that has increased that tension. “Note that if it cost him, that anyone would say that he has not assumed it,” he stressed when asked if a focus of that discrepancy was Calvo’s reluctance to leave those powers to them.

“I think that, in short, we have reached a level of confrontation that I think is true that it had not been reached until now and we are very concernedLet’s say, a certain arrogant attitude that we are seeing on certain occasions from our partners. This does concern us and, in short, for what may affect the governance of the country and the very progressive project that we want to push between the two “, stressed the parliamentarian of United We Can questioned whether his partners had crossed” red lines “marked in the coalition.

They deny having maneuvered against the ‘Zerolo law’

He has also explained that they abstained from taking into consideration the Law of Equal Treatment promoted by the PSOE by not being able to sign a text of these characteristics, which was not agreed with United We Can. In fact, he has insisted that have agreed operating protocols between both formations that, in this specific case, have not been met.

However, he has denied that his parliamentary group maneuvered against this law. “To say that we are trying to knock her down is to be openly disingenuous”, has blurted out to challenge socialist leaders, whom it blames for that leak, to provide any evidence or indication regarding “such serious accusations.” And it is that, ultimately, Guijarro has opined that what happened reveals “simply a kind of childish pique.”

“Serious differences”

Yes he has recognized that this clash shows that “There are serious differences between both political spaces in the management of equality issues”. He then recognized that the “world of feminism linked to the PSOE” has played an important role in the advancement of fundamental rights.

But said this “It makes no sense” that they now try to assume “a monopoly of the truth” and the “flag of feminism”, when it is a matter that concerns the whole of society and “everyone must collaborate”. “You do not have to play this, because the Scattergories is mine and if not, I’ll take it,” he has ironized with a famous advertisement for this board game.

No risk of rupture

In spite of everything, Guijarro believes that there is no risk of the coalition breaking up, as he trusts that its usefulness for a majority of citizens is a “guarantee” that there will be a government and it will remain “strong”, although he has subsequently warned that deviating from that marked path (the coalition agreement) will “weaken” him.

Therefore, he has urged the PSOE that if you do not feel comfortable with the established protocols, it is best to sit down and talk and review them, but not breach them “unilaterally”.

Regarding his bill to repeal crimes of opinion, the secretary general of the confederal group has stressed that they have waited for Justice “months” and that registered their initiative after having the final agreement with the Ministry. Therefore, they will “push” for it to be approved because the fact that a rapper, referring to Pablo Hasél, is in jail indicates that they are “late”.

Asked if there is fatigue in the PSOE with United We Can, Guijarro has said that “we will have to ask them” but has clarified that everyone is learning in Spain the culture of coalition within the state government, in which debates that previously took place they were limited to Congress or Senate.

In this line, he has indicated that the debates within the Executive are normal in other European countries and that his approaches pivot on “ensuring that the government pact is fulfilled.”


Regarding the disturbances in the protests against Hasél’s imprisonment, the United Podemos deputy has pointed out that the violent acts do not represent the majority of the people who have demonstrated peacefully.

However, he has detailed that the debate should not be on whether “the protesters do it well or badly” but rather “why they are demonstrating”, given that there is “outrage” at a “democratic anomaly” on the situation of freedom of expression , one of the “pillars” of society and that questions “directly the democratic quality of the country.”

Finally and with regard to the negotiation for the renewal of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), he hopes that an agreement can be reached to end this “democratic abnormality” that supposes the blockade in the replacement of representatives of the governing body of the judges. In this sense, Guijarro has made it clear that they will be in this negotiation.

Important Alert

Dear reader.
I hope you are in health and well.
I offer you important instructions regarding this article

  • We only want readers to access information quickly and easily using other multilingual content, rather than information only available in a specific language.
  • We always respect the copyright of the author's content and always include
    The original link of the Source Article , and if the author does not agree, leave The report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the author's request. Thank you so much! Warm greetings!


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here